- May 28, 2026
- 2:46 pm
Rahu In Indian Classical Astrology
People often complain that I speak. I too know that I speak bitter. Bitter speech is for the better of wisdom being sold for butter. Who doesn’t know the truth? Research is without search. People develop Nadi from the division of signs? I only say – check if your division is correct and proper? This hurts. Should it?
Some bring Bhrigu, others bring Narada and yet another to someone else? When would astrology; as a true academic subject, be allowed to belong to its own intelligent students? Some say in spiritual astrology —- at which point of time was astrology not spiritual? Talk of financial astrology has moved to astrology of infatuation and lots love guruji get popped up from the holes of Earth. Each time they kneed the breasts of astrology for milk they come out with venom?
Rahu, Rahu and Rahu. When the peculiarity and pungency of Rahu was not admitted in Indian classical astrology? Yes, the importance of Rahu was as never as was later made by the Quacks of Karma sitting inside the temples. One who speaks the truth becomes bad. And all those who relish and flourish through such ugly occupation of fraud and cheating come forward and cry – this is an attack on faith. Astrology is now operating on the same philosophy.
But that is quite natural and normal. The more important thing is to start discussing now as to how Rahu is being or has been given the status of a planet. Scholars and teachers are silent over it. But why? Are we trying to over project Rahu? Who will go deep into it? Anyone who is trying to become smart through a post on Rahu should first do this by giving a write up to that effect. This would at least enable the students to think and analyse